Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Brooklyn Edison Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion by plaintiff for judgment sustaining a demurrer to separate defense.

1Opinion of the CourtKelby, J.

This action is brought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The defense, which is demurred to, alleges that plaintiff, at the time of the injury, was employed by the Audley Clarke Company and made a claim, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, for compensation, and accepted compensation from the Audley Clarke Company, and, therefore, is not the real party in interest, these facts being pleaded in bar of recovery. The direct attack on the defense is that it does not allege that there ever was any award made under the Compensation Law,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. New York Railways Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Sabatino v. Thomas Crimmins Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lunn v. AndrewsNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hodges v. Bewley Truesdale Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Mezzanotte v. MaurerNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API