United States v. Pitotto
District Court, D. Oregon
John Pitotto and one Battaglia were separately indicted for resisting a revenue officer in the execution of a search warrant, and he demurs to the indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
WOLVERTON, District Judge.
The defendant is here under an indictment charging that he did unlawfully and feloniously use a deadly weapon in resisting persons authorized to make search and seizure, to wit, Delazon C. Smith and Harold M. Charlton, they being officers of the Internal Revenue Department of the United States, in the execution of their duty, namely, in executing a search warrant “duly and regularly issued” by the commissioner of the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon, with intent to commit bodily injury upon them, and to deter and prevent them from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Veeder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- United States v. TureaudU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1884
- Ripper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Sparks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- State v. LockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Schencks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.