Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Forrester

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 5, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The rights of the parties under the timber deeds depends upon the construction to be placed upon that clause which provides for the trees and timber “to be cut and paid for within two years after the completion of a railroad down Mill Creek.”

The timber deeds were executed on the 7th day of January, 1907. It is well settled in this State that in a sale of standing timber, when there is no time fixed in the contract within which the purchaser is to remove the timber, the purchaser shall have a reasonable time, considering all the facts and circumstances…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Liston v. Chapman & Dewey Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Fletcher v. LyonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Hall v. Wellman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Garden City Stave & Heading Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
  2. Martin v. FrazierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Young v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Excelsior Mining Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Beal v. Las Vegas Savings BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API