Bleeker v. Villarreal
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We overrule Bleeker’s motion for rehearing and for rehearing en bane, but we will briefly address Bleeker’s venue arguments to clarify our decision.
Bleeker contends that our opinion improperly encumbered him with the burden of proof on the venue issue. Before the trial court, the burden of proof is placed on “the party pleading the venue fact” to “make pri-ma facie proof of that venue fact” when it has been specifically denied. Tex.R.Civ.P. 87.3(a). On appeal, however, we search “the entire record, including the trial on the merits.” Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bonham State Bank v. BeadleTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- WTFO, INC. v. Braithwaite, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- Gonzalez v. Nielson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.