Legal Opinion

Domenech v. National City Bank of NY

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 4, 1935No. 386PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

The respondent, a national banking association whose principal office and place of business is in New York, ap plied for ,and obtained authority to operate branches in Puerto Rico, pursuant to § 25 of the Federal Reserve Act as amended. In 1932 the bank, as required by local law, filed with the petitioner a sworn statement of assets as a basis of assessment for taxation. By request, but under protest, it attached a memorandum stated to be for information only, in which was set forth the amount of its total assets, the sum of its capital, surplus, and undivided profits, the percentage the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Owensboro National Bank v. OwensboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Talbott v. Silver Bow CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Examining Bd. of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores De OteroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (PR), Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Baltimore National Bank v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API