Scherer v. Scandrett
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
One question only is presented on this appeal: Was there sufficient evidence of plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence to warrant submission of that issue to the jury ? Plaintiff had thé burden of proof, but on tbe motion to direct verdict be was entitled to have the evidence bearing on that issue viewed in tbe light most favorable to himself. It becomes necessary to set out the substance of tbe record with that in mind.
Defendants are trustees of the property of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Bailroad Company. One of its lines runs east and west through the village of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Artz v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Hinken v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Bannister v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Darden v. Chicago & Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Van Wie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- Shaw v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Maier v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.