Eriks v. Denver
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnson, J.
(dissenting in part, concurring in part) The majority affirms the trial court's summary judgment ruling that William James Denver violated DR 5-105 of the former Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR). In so holding, the majority concludes that CPR DR 5-105 may be violated whenever a "potential" conflict of interest exists, even though the rule is written in terms of "likely" conflicts of interest. The majority's unfortunate extension of CPR DR 5-105's clear language greatly burdens the attorneys of this state, for "potential" conflicts of interest exist in almost every case of multiple…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.