Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Eriks v. Denver

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1992No. 57235-6Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnson, J.

(dissenting in part, concurring in part) The majority affirms the trial court's summary judgment ruling that William James Denver violated DR 5-105 of the former Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR). In so holding, the majority concludes that CPR DR 5-105 may be violated whenever a "potential" conflict of interest exists, even though the rule is written in terms of "likely" conflicts of interest. The majority's unfortunate extension of CPR DR 5-105's clear language greatly burdens the attorneys of this state, for "potential" conflicts of interest exist in almost every case of multiple…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API