Legal Opinion
State v. Black
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1984No. 48294-2PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
Appellant, State of Washington, seeks reversal of the trial court decision which held that the alleged conduct of respondent real estate brokers did nbt constitute an unfair method of competition under RCW 19.86.020. The State further challenges the trial court's conclusion that respondent Black did not violate the terms of a 1974 consent decree. Finally, the State asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees to the prevailing defendants pursuant to the discretionary authority granted under RCW 19.86.080.
*795We affirm the trial court's conclusion that respondents…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Litton Industrial Products, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Solid State Systems Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & LightWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1990
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.