Holland v. Superior Court of S.F.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and to George A. Sturtevant, Judge thereof. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Patrick Holland applied for a writ of mandate to require the respondent judge of the superior court to certify as correct a certain offered 'bill of exceptions (a copy of which is included in the petition) if he finds it to be correct, or to fix a time and place for the settlement of a proper bill of exceptions, excluding therefrom all matters occurring after the entry of a certain purported judgment of December 19, 1913, and particularly those things which happened after January 9, 1914.
Respondents filed both a demurrer and an answer to the petition.
From the petition it appears…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Warring v. FreearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holland v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Crawford v. MeadowsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Oliver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Williamson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933