Legal Opinion

United States v. Julian Sarmiento and Florentino Suarez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 21, 1985No. 84-5305PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

The sole issue in this case is whether United States customs officers had authority to board a vessel on the high seas, seize marijuana found aboard, arrest the occupants of the vessel, and prosecute the occupants. The occupants, the appellees, were charged with possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute, conspiracy to possess marijuana with the intent to distribute, and assault on a federal officer.

The government brings this appeal because the district court dismissed the indictment holding that an agency regulation could not expand the limited statutory authority granted to customs.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank Gunnar WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Frank Diehl Farms v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Olaf Peter Juda Raymond Edward Missell Anthony Burg Frans Gustaaf Van Der Hoeven and Christopher Dean ParisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. CHARTER MEDICAL CORP., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Luis Enrique GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. All That Tract & Parcel of Land: 2306 North Eiffel CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1985
  5. United States v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API