Legal Opinion
Hollwedel v. Duffy-Mott Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 2, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.
Defendant employed plaintiff as manager of a part of its business. The employment was under a written contract dated September 27,. 1929, at a minimum annual salary of $12,000. The defendant by motion in New York county challenged the sufficiency of the complaint claiming that no fixed term of employment was provided by the contract. The Special Term denied the defendant’s motion and on appeal the Appellate Division in the First Department affirmed the order granted by the Special Term sustaining the complaint, writing in a memorandum: “ Whether the plaintiff Hollwedel had a contract of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Schell v. . PlumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Nichols v. Scranton Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Sider v. . General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hollwedel v. Duffy-Mott Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Wallace Steel, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Passaic Distributors, Inc. v. Sherman CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974