State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
The three indigent defendants each had different counsel assigned to represent them. As was proper under such circumstances, only one record was filed in this court. Each defendant made separate assignments of error. We therefore consider the appeal and assignments of each defendant separately.
None of the defendants moved to quash the bills of indictment. Both Maddox and Brown moved that judgment be arrested (without citing any reasons), but Phillips did not make such a motion. However, the State, in its brief, calls attention to the bills of indictment and cites the case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. PorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McDougaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. MandinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. OakesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.