In the Matter of the Interpretation of S.D. Const. Art. Xl § 2 and Viii § 16
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ADVISORY OPINION
TO HIS EXCELLENCY, DENNIS DAU-GAARD, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
[¶ 1.] You requested two advisory opinions from this Court dealing with the constitutionality of SB 136 and SB 159. 1 Both acts were passed by the 2016 South Dakota Legislature. Your request indicates you must sign them, let them become law without your signature, or veto them within 15 days of March 11, 2016. S.D. Const, art. V, § 5. You asked;
# 27786 (SB 136: cropland assessment) .
1. Does SB 136, An Act to permit certain cropland along lakes, rivers, and streams to be assessed as noncrop-land,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonald v. Sch. Bd. of Yankton Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 1South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Wegleitner v. SattlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Opinion of the JudgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- In re the Constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 65Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- In re State CensusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In the Matter of the Interpretation of South Dakota Constitution and State Law Re: State Legislator's Interest in State or County ContractsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- In the Matter of the Interpretation of S.D. Const. and State Law Re: Eligibility for Crf Grant ProgramsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Advisory OpinionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
- in Re Advisory Opinion on 2018 Pa 368 & 369Michigan Supreme Court · 2019
- in Re Advisory Opn on 2018 Pa 368-9 (Senate)Michigan Supreme Court · 2019