Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Noble

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2008No. 06-CV-1430PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Associate Judge:

Thirteen-year-old Elijah Campbell was viciously mauled by pit bulls that belonged to Aaron Harris. A default judgment in the amount of $1,115,111.25 was entered against Harris, but it is doubtful that anything approaching this amount can be collected, so Elijah and his mother sought to hold the landlord, Raymon Noble, liable for his injuries. The Superior Court granted summary judgment to appellee Noble because he had no authority under the lease to evict Harris for keeping pit bulls. We affirm.

The Basic Facts

Defendant/appellee Raymon Noble owned a building at 733 8th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Clemmons v. FidlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. Youssef v. 3636 CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Auster v. Norwalk United Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Tracey v. SoleskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Eric Toomer v. William C. Smith & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Abdul-Azim v. Howard University HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Abdul-Azim v. Howard University HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API