Legal Opinion

Clemmons v. Fidler

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 24, 1990No. 12774-1-IIPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Worswick, J. —

We are asked to extend the common law rule concerning liability for dog bites by holding that a landlord is liable for harm caused by his tenant's dog if the landlord knows that the dog has vicious tendencies. We decline, and we affirm a summary judgment dismissing Marti Clemmons' claim against Clarence Fidler.

Terry Calhoun had no pets when she rented a single-family house in Forks from Clarence Fidler on an oral month-to-month tenancy. Later, she married Mike Phil-brook and the Philbrooks acquired a pit bull named Popeye, which they kept chained to a truck axle in the yard of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Regan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Smaxwell v. BayardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Frobig v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ortega v. FlaimWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Batra v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. Feister v. BosackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API