Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Burnham

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided June 16, 2015No. 2012-CA-01218-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FAIR, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is granted. The original opinion is withdrawn and this opinion substituted.

¶ 2. In this appeal from a judgment of divorce, Matthew Burnham argues that the chancery court ordered him to pay too much child support and that its division of the marital, property was inequitable. We find that substantial evidence supports the chancellor’s finding that Matthew could earn, and had earned, more than he claimed to be making, and that the property division, though' unequal, was within the chancellor’s discretion because it was calculated to eliminate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Chamblee v. ChambleeMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bluewater Logistics, LLC v. WillifordMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Anderson v. AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matthew Burnham v. Dana BurnhamMississippi Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API