Legal Opinion
Reddish v. Washington Metro Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 11, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2022-2658Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRINA E. REDDISH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-2658 (RDM) WASHINGTON METRO AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Trina E. Reddish brings this action against her former employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), alleging discrimination and retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The parties have completed discovery, and WMATA now moves for summary judgment on all claims. Among other…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.