Legal Opinion

Austin v. Danford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 1983No. 80-1087-L; CA A23441PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiffs (tenants) brought an action against defendants (landlords) under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. ORS 91.700 to 91.895. Tenants alleged that landlords (1) failed to maintain the rented premises in a habitable condition, (2) deliberately refused or were grossly negligent in failing to provide an essential service and (3) engaged in retaliatory conduct by threatening to bring an action to evict tenants. The trial court entered judgment for landlords. We affirm.

On February 1, 1980, tenants began renting a mobile home located in a rural area under an oral agreement with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Tatum v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Austin v. DanfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API