Legal Opinion

Cropmark Direct, LLC v. Mark Urbanczyk, Marvin Sparks and Agrarian Management, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided June 7, 2012No. 07-11-00426-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves the denial of a motion to compel arbitration. The request was made per clauses appearing in marketing contracts between CropMark Direct, LLC, and Mark Urbanczyk, Marvin Sparks, and Agrarian Management, Inc. (collectively referred to as Urbanczyk). The trial court denied the motion after determining that the contractual right in question had been waived. We affirm the order.

Background

The contracts at issue were executed in 2008 and granted CropMark an option to buy cotton grown by Urbanczyk. In 2010, a dispute arose between the parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re AIU Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Universal Underwriters of Texas Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Okorafor v. UNCLE SAM & ASSOCIATES, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  5. In Re Houston Pipe Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cole v. Jersey City Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. Richmont Holdings, Inc. v. Superior Recharge Systems, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. CNU of Alabama, LLC v. Shakeena Cox (Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court: CV-23-22).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024
  4. Llano Logistics, Inc. v. Ulysses Carmona, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2022
  5. Preferred Pools of Houston, Inc. v. Avani Gossai and Thani Gossai, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API