Legal Opinion

Sprung v. Zalowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A trustee in bankruptcy sues on two counts: First, to recover money paid under duress, and, second, to recover a preferential payment.

The first cause of action is insufficiently pleaded in at least three respects: (1) While apparently a series of payments under duress is pleaded, only one threat is alleged. Payments under duress imply some present threat or fear and allegations should be made accordingly. (Dunham v. Griswold, 100 N. Y. 224.) (2) There is nothing to show that in any case the charge was not true and that the money was not due. (Union Exchange Nat. Bank v. Joseph, 231 N. Y. 250;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunham v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Union Exchange National Bank v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dubin v. DubinNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In re DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API