Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1992No. 92-225PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5747.01(A), during the audit period, defined “adjusted gross income,” on which the Ohio income tax is levied (see R.C. 5747.02), as follows:

“ ‘Adjusted gross income’ means adjusted gross income as that term is defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code * * *, and excludes any amounts of income included in adjusted gross income by reason of Subchapter S, Chapter 1, Subtitle A, of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 1371. *****

The Eatons argue that the statute allows them to deduct all Subchapter S income allocated to them and that this prevents double taxation of Subchapter S income.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pancake House, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mandel v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mandel v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API