Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1994No. 93-1405PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5747.01(A), for the tax year at issue, defined “adjusted gross income” as:

“ * * * adjusted gross income as that term is defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code, and exclud[ing] interest or dividends on obligations of the United States and its territories and possessions or of any authority, commission, or instrumentality of the United States to the extent includible in gross income for federal income tax purposes but exempt from state income taxes under the laws of the United States * * (Emphasis added.)

The Mandéis admit that Ohio may lawfully net interest income with interest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Atlanta v. Bartow County Board of Tax AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pancake House, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eaton v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hirsch v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Mandel v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mandel v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API