Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 2007No. A06-1344Published

1DissentMeyer, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The school district’s position, adopted by the majority, removes the compensation judge’s discretion from the statute, is inconsistent with the function of a medical examination in the resolution of medical questions, and undermines the legislative plan for the efficient delivery of compensation to injured workers. I would conclude that the statute is not clear and free from all ambiguity, and that it should more reasonably be read as providing for the mandatory appointment of a neutral physician only when there is a genuine need for such evidence.

Minnesota Statutes §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nord v. City of CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Stevens v. Computer Metal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Reimer v. Minnit Tool/M.I.T. Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API