Legal Opinion
PlayUp, Inc. v. Mintas
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 20, 2023No. 2:21-cv-02129Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 PLAYUP, INC., Case No. 2:21-cv-02129-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9 v. [Docket No. 246] 10 DR. LAILA MINTAS, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions. Docket No. 246. 13 Defendant filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 273. Plaintiff filed a reply. Docket No. 14 283. The motion was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge. The motion is properly 15 resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed below, the motion for 16 Rule 11 sanctions is DENIED…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gomez v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Baker v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Lichtenstein v. Consolidated Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Ashland Fire Brick Co. v. General Refractories Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.