Legal Opinion

State v. Branch

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2013No. S-12-1010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. BRANCH 83 Cite as

286 Neb. 83

district court will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. State v. Robinson, 285 Neb. 394,

827 N.W.2d 292

(2013). “The entry of filing by the clerk is the best evidence of the date of filing and is presumed to be correct until the contrary is shown.” State v. Hess, 261 Neb. 368, 377-78,

622 N.W.2d 891, 901

(2001). The district court’s finding that Smith filed his motion outside the 1-year period was not clearly erroneous. VI. CONCLUSION The district court did not err in denying postconviction relief without an evidentiary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BranchNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. BranchNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Floyd v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  5. Parnell v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API