Legal Opinion

DeFever v. City of Waukesha

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 28, 2007No. 2006AP3053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

¶ 1. Michael D. DeFever and other tenants of the Kendal Glen Apartments (DeFever) appeal from the summary judgment dismissal of their claims against the City of Waukesha and Waukesha Water Utility (Waukesha) based upon governmental immunity. DeFever contends that Waukesha is not immune because it violated a ministerial duty and, further, that we should extend the "public officers" exception recognized for medical professionals to Waukesha's immunity claim. We disagree and affirm the summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. On January 21, 2004, a water main ruptured under an entrance ramp to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of ShelbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of James Franklin Perry v. Cheryl WenzelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Umansky v. ABC InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Doe v. St. Francis School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
  4. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API