Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District

¶1. The Petitioner, John Kierstyn (Kierstyn), seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals that affirmed *84the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Racine Unified School District (the District).1 Kierstyn argues that the District and its employee benefits specialist are not immune from suit under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(4) when the employee gave incorrect information regarding disability benefits. Because we determine that the employee's act does not fit any exception to public officer immunity, we affirm the court of appeals.

¶ 2. For purposes of this summary…