King v. Rutledge
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
1. Without deciding whether or not the plaintiffs in the court below could amend their petition as is here attempted, we find that the petition does not set out a cause of action for any of the relief sought. Count one of the petition as amended seeks to recover a general judgment against all the defendants for the sum alleged to be due. The petition alleges that the defendant Joe Fossett, a contractor, was employed by the defendants Mr. and Mrs. Rutledge to make improvements and repairs to described property belonging to them, and that the defendant Joe Fossett bought…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Mauck v. RosserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Griffin Bros. v. Gainesville Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Loyd v. LoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Chambers Lumber Co. v. GilmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mull v. Mickey's Lumber & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Womack Industries, Inc. v. B & a Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Allied Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Kern & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- GEC CORPORATION v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Jordan Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.