Legal Opinion
Loyd v. Loyd
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 11, 1948No. 16189PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In Smith v. Locomotive Engineers &c. Ins. Assn., 138 Ga. 717 (76 S. E. 44), this court dealt with facts very .similar to those here involved, the only difference being that there the insurer appears to have disputed the claim of the wife, while here the insurer was indifferent as to which claimant should prevail, paid the money into court, and was discharged. In that case it was held that, because the insured had made no effort to have the beneficiary changed, the named beneficiary was entitled to the proceeds of the policy.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Smith v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Dell v. VarnedoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Archer v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Brown v. DennisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beckwith v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Knight v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Faircloth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Mrs. Mae Hester Bohannon v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Belote v. BeloteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.