Legal Opinion
People v. Frontier Pacific Ins. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1998No. H017123PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
In this action we consider whether a court may look beyond the record of proceedings where the presence of a criminal defendant is lawfully required and the defendant fails to appear to determine whether there was sufficient cause for a continuance pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 1305.1. This question arises within the context of the appeal by Frontier Pacific Insurance Company (Frontier) from the denial of its motion to vacate forfeiture and exonerate bail. We hold that where the record of the actual proceedings fails to disclose that the court had sufficient cause for a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. Topa InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. Allegheny Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Bankers Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.