Reynolds v. Haulcroft
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding under the provisions of Act 119 of the acts of the legislature of 1935, the State of Arkansas brought appropriate proceedings in the Eastern District of the Lawrence chancery court to confirm its title to a large number of tracts of land, alleged to have been forfeited for the nonpayment of taxes. Lots 8 and 9, block 16, town of Hoxie, Lawrence county, were involved in the state action.
Appellants, Alma G. Dodson and James W. Reynolds, a minor, by his mother as next friend, intervened and alleged, among other things, that "they are the owners of lots 8 and 9, block 16, original town…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunt v. JacobsonNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Andrews v. GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Long-Bell Lumber Sales Corp. v. PerrittMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by9 opinions
- Semler v. OertwigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. WardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Lankford v. MilhollinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Glick Cleaning Laundry Co. v. Wade, Adm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Hampton v. Commercial Credit Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.