Legal Opinion
Alan R. Vaughn v. City of North Branch
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2004No. 03-3530UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Alan R. Vaughn appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion and his request for appointment of a special prosecutor, and from the district court’s imposition of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c) sanctions. Vaughn has also filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, claiming the district court denied him his right to a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rule 60(b) relief. Even setting aside the issue of the timeliness of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richard T. Arnold v. Gael D. Wood, Drema L. Grant, Daniel M. Buescher, the Law Firm of Eckelkamp, Eckelkamp, Wood and Kuenzel, Angela D. WiedaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Dan Ivy v. Warren Kimbrough David W. ShullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Sassower v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Claude E. Harris, Jr. v. Interstate Brands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Padraic Cook, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vaughn v. City of North Branch, MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005