Legal Opinion

Foster v. Swasey

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided October 15, 1846No. Case No. 4,984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODBURY, Circuit Justice.

The motion is refused, because it is so late. The place-of the plaintiff’s residence appears in the bill, and was known several terms ago. 1 Daniels, Eq. Prac. 36, 41; 3 Johns. Ch. 520. The motion, therefore, should have been made-before so much cost was incurred, and the case ready for a hearing. A motion of this kind, too, is granted only when the party is a resident abroad. Newl. Ch. Pr. 410. Cases exist where being resident in Ireland or Scot*581land has been regarded as abroad for this purpose. But those countries are under distinct judicial tribunals, and in some…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goodrich v. PendletonNew York Court of Chancery · 1818

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  2. Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API