Legal Opinion

Edward Thompson Co. v. Durand

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 14, 1909No. 17,643PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to Court of Appeal, Parish of Iberia. Garnishment by the Edward Thompson Company against W. J. Durand. Judgment for defendant was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and plaintiff applies for certiorari or writ of review.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

This is a garnishment proceeding instituted in aid of the collection of a judgment.

The case is before us on a writ of review.

In matter of this writ of garnishment, interrogatories were filed calling upon the People’s National Bank of New Iberia to answer if the defendant, Walter J. Durand, had cash to his credit in bank.

The answer of the cashier of the bank was that it had no cash to his credit; that there is cash to the credit of W. J. Durand, president of the Louisiana Auto Club, to wit, the sum of $432.23, and also a note, which the bank holds as collateral security, for an amount of $170.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Cram v. ShackletonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  3. Brunswick Gas Light Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Airey Stouse v. HokeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. First State Bank v. BurtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Smith v. McCallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Charles B. Nelsen & Co. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API