Legal Opinion

Airey Stouse v. Hoke

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 28, 1927No. 26773PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit by attachment against defendant, a nonresident, and made C. P. Ellis & Co. garnishee. The garnishee answered that it had no funds in its hands belonging to defendant, and was not .indebted to him in any sum whatsoever.

It admitted however that:

“It carries on its books an account entitled Barrett £ Oo., Ino., % B. P. Bolee, for the purchase and sale of cotton future contracts; which account at present stands with a ledger credit balance of $1,157.12. Said account was initiated by orders from, and upon the sole responsibility of, Barrett & Co., Inc., of Augusta, Ga., and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. David v. RodeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Edward Thompson Co. v. DurandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Mansfield v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jemko, Inc. v. LiaghatNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. First State Bank v. BurtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. United States v. Allen Brothers of Homer, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
  4. Pine Tree Assoc. v. Subway RestaurantsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Jetco, Inc. v. Bank of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API