Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Richardson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 2000No. 32,951-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JjWILLIAMS, Judge.
The defendant, Zola Richardson, appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of plaintiff, Sears, Roebuck and Co. For the following reasons, we amend the summary judgment in part, and affirm as amended.
FACTS
On October 20,1998, the plaintiff, Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”), filed suit against the defendant, Zola Richardson, to recover funds allegedly due on the defendant’s credit card account. Sears was at*191tempting to recover the sum of $1,273.44 together with interest accrued from August 26, 1998, and 25% attorney’s fees. Sears alleges that, as a condition of opening the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hayes v. AutinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Haywood v. Louisiana Sugar Cane ProductsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ebarb v. MatlockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- CACV of Colorado, LLC v. SpiehlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Capital One, NA v. WaltersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2003-1 v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Capital One Bank (USA) NA v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.