Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1986No. Docket 86136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On January 31, 1983, the Michigan Public Service Commission issued an opinion and order continuing the existing surcharges collected by both Consumers Power and Detroit Edison pursuant to their "Other Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Expense Indexing Systems” until completion of the pending general rate cases of each company. The commission denied each utilities’ request for an increase of the existing surcharge. Ingham Circuit Judge Robert Holmes Bell affirmed the commission’s order on June 10, 1985. The Attorney General now appeals as of right.

The Other O & M Indexing Systems were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Public Service Commission 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Great Lakes Steel Division of National Steel Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Proposals D & HMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Attorney General v. Public Service Commission 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Attorney General v. Public Service Commission 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Attorney General v. Public Service Commission 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API