Legal Opinion

Salinas v. FCA US LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 9, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00419Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDITH SALINAS, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-0419 - JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S ) MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 13 v. ) ) (Doc. 55) 14 FCA US LLC, et al., ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Edith Salinas asserts that FCA US LLC is liable for violations of the Song-Beverly act and 18 fraudulent inducement under California law. The parties settled the underlying claims, and Plaintiff 19 now seeks an award of attorney fees and costs. (Doc. 55) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s 20…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API