Legal Opinion
Kastrati v. M.E.G. Restaurant Enterprises Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 2, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00481Unknown
1Opinion
VLADECK, RASKIN & CLARK, P.C. JEREMIAH IADEVAIA 212.403.7323 JIADEVAIA @ VLADECK.COM August 27, 2021 Plaintiff's motion to compel is GRANTED because the information sough By ECF relevant to his job performance and as comparator evidence. Honorable Lorna G. Schofield United States District Court = The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. No Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square Dated: September 2, 2021 New York, NY 10007 New York, New York Re: Kastrati v. M.E.G. Restaurant Enterprises Ltd, No. 1:21 Civ. 0481 (LGS) LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stella Chertkova v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Ruiz v. County of RocklandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Tse v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.