Legal Opinion
Hastings v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
These are six appeals on a consolidated record from judgments entered upon decisions of the Appellate Division affirming judgments dismissing a consolidated complaint against the respondents and from the orders dismissing said complaint under rule 106 of Rules of Civil Practice upon the ground that it appeared upon the face of the complaint that the plaintiff had not legal capacity to sue.
The paragraph of the complaint upon which appellant must rely is as follows: .'
“ 1. On or about the 27th day of September, 1935, Standard Gas and Electric Company filed in the District Court of the United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Howarth v. . AngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Ward v. . PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Mabon v. . Ongley Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Stone v. Penn Yan, Keuka Park & Branchport RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Cohen v. American Surety Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Hastings v. Byllesby Co. (Haystone)New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Hastings v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Austrian v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Frank v. LuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.