Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC v. Hualapai Indian Tribe
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Defendants Hualapai Indian Tribe and seven named members of the Hualapai *878Tribal Council have filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC’s (“GCSD”) first amended complaint to compel arbitration. Doc. 19; see Doc. 18. The motion has been fully briefed. Docs. 21, 29. Defendants also have filed a motion to disqualify Green-berg Traurig (“GT”) as counsel for GCSD and for related orders protecting the Tribe’s confidential information. Doc. 25. GT has filed a response in opposition which GCSD joined. Docs. 43, 37. For the reasons…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Acres Bonusing, Inc v. Lester MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Aphrodite v. RegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Payne ex rel. Estate of Hamrick v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw IndiansDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2015