Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Loizzo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 29, 1997No. 87 Civ. 6024 (MJL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LOWE, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of plaintiff William Daniels (“Plaintiff’), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) (“Rule 15(a)”), for leave to amend the Complaint. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Plaintiffs motion in part and denies it in part. Specifically, the Court permits Plaintiff to add pendent state claims for assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress and to correct the misspelling of defendant police officer Daniel Fischer’s last name. The Court denies the motion to the extent that it proposes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Stanley Cohen, Gerald A. Garfinkle, Eastern Artists and Drafting Materials, Inc. v. Elliott Koenig, and Robert KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shell v. BrzezniakDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  2. Allstate Insurance v. ElzanatyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Sokolski v. Trans Union Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  4. Enron Corp. v. J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (In Re Enron Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Mhany Management Inc. v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API