Legal Opinion

U.S. Industrial Products Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 17, 1968No. C.D. 3476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

These protests, which were consolidated for trial, involve certain moldings and frame sections having wooden cores and metal exteriors. The imports were uniformly assessed with duty by the collector at a rate of 19 percent ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as articles in chief value of *620metal.1 Plaintiff claims tliat tlie moldings are properly dutiable at 16% percent ad valorem under paragraph. 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as “manufactures of wood * * * not specially provided for,” 2 and that the frame sections are likewise…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Norwich Pharmacal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. United States v. MortimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. KeyesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Dakota · 1898
  5. State v. ForshaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API