U.S. Industrial Products Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
These protests, which were consolidated for trial, involve certain moldings and frame sections having wooden cores and metal exteriors. The imports were uniformly assessed with duty by the collector at a rate of 19 percent ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as articles in chief value of *620metal.1 Plaintiff claims tliat tlie moldings are properly dutiable at 16% percent ad valorem under paragraph. 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as “manufactures of wood * * * not specially provided for,” 2 and that the frame sections are likewise…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Norwich Pharmacal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- United States v. MortimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. KeyesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Dakota · 1898
- State v. ForshaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971