Legal Opinion

International Minerals and Chemical Corporation v. Llano, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1985No. 83-2657PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.

International Minerals and Chemical Corporation (IMC) brought this diversity action against Llano, Inc. (Llano), seeking a declaratory judgment that it was excused from its obligation to pay for natural gas under a contract between IMC and Llano. Llano counterclaimed for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. The Kronprinzessin CecilieSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Earn Line S. S. Co. v. Sutherland S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lenape Resources Corp. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Northern Indiana Public Service Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Carbon County Coal Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Prenalta Corp. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Sabine Corp. v. ONG Western, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Chemco, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API