Legal Opinion

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 29, 1976No. 16751PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is an original action for mandamus in which relator seeks to have the District Court set aside an order granting a mistrial in a suit for damages tried to a jury, and to require the court to enter a judgment on the incomplete verdict returned by the jury. The writ of mandamus is granted.

During the course of their deliberations the jury in Cause No. 906,232, entitled James Slusser v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., et al., made known to the court that it had answered all issues submitted with the exception of the issue on damages, and that it was hopelessly deadlocked on that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Johnson v. Court of Civil AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Blanton v. E. & L. Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Stalder v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCauley v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
  2. Pate v. Texline Feed Mills, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
  3. De Los Angeles Garay v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Sam's Texaco & Towing, Inc. v. GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Astec Industries, Inc. v. SuarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API