Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

HOLLAND FURANCE COMPANY v. Robson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 1965No. 20748PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle.

The defendant in error, Mrs. Mary Jane Robson, will be referred to as Mrs. Robson, or as plaintiff. The plaintiff in error, the Holland Furnace Company, will be referred to as the Company, or as defendant. Mrs. Robson brought this action in the Denver District Court to recover damages for injuries she allegedly sustained as a result of fraudulent representations made by the Company’s agents.

The evidence produced at the trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, showed that on November 29, 1960, two of the Company’s mechanics came to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Andersen-Randolph Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Clark v. GiacominiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Keeney v. AngellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  5. Moreland v. AustinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Frick v. AbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. In Re KeyworthDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API