Roskilly v. Boeing Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Knudson, J.:
The Boeing Company and the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania appeal the decision of the Workers Compensation Board (Board) awarding Patrick J. Roskilly work disability benefits. Boeing argues Roskilly is not entitled to work disability benefits under our previous decision in Watkins v. Food Barn Stores, Inc., 23 Kan. App. 2d 837, 936 P.2d 294 (1997). The following issues are presented: (1) Did the Board correctly interpret K.S.A. 44-510e(a); and (2) is Roskilly entitled to work disability benefits?
We affirm. Under the Board’s findings, Roskilly demonstrated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Neal v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Webber v. Automotive Controls Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Gadberry v. R. L. Polk & Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- WATKINS, JR. v. Food Barn Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Gutierrez v. Dold Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Stephen v. Phillips CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- Lake v. Jessee TruckingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.