Legal Opinion

State v. Quatman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1954No. 173PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYounger, P. J.

The defendant-appellant was in-dieted by the Grand Jury of Auglaize County, under Section 12421, General Code, on a charge of assault with intent to kill.

In its charge to the jury, the trial court charged as to the essential elements of the crime of assault with intent to kill and furnished the jurors with verdict No. 1 finding the defendant guilty of the charge, to use if in their deliberations they were convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt of the crime charged.

The court then instructed the jury that if “after consideration you find that the defendant Quatman is not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Todor v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GraceOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. State v. LoudermillOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API