Legal Opinion
Hadlich v. American Mail Line
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 12, 1949No. 27602-GPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
These are motions to dismiss, for improper venue, ten causes filed to recover alleged unpaid compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Defendants are foreign corporations, admittedly doing bus! ness in California, but they are not domiciled in this State, nor have they appointed agents for the service of process in this state in accordance with applicable California statutes.
§ 1391(c), Title 28 U.S.C.A., which became effective September 1, 1948, permits suits to be maintained against corporations doing business in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814
- Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Neild v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McGinley v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Brooks v. Texas Employers Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Rensing v. Turner Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- Chovan v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
- Torres v. GambleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.