Legal Opinion

Listino v. Union Paving Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1956No. Appeal, 189PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Was defendant’s negligence the proximate cause of the accident, or did the acts of plaintiff’s husband break the causal connection and become the superseding cause of the accident?

Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, as we must on a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, these are the facts:

Clara Listino was a passenger in the car driven by her husband proceeding south on Sproul Boad — a wide concrete two lane highway — at about 30 to 35 miles an hour, on the evening of November 21, 1952. The night was dark and rainy with no…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Cecile Industries, Inc. And John Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API